不同地层条件盾构始发对地表沉降影响规律研究

隧道建设（中英文） ›› 2011, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 463-469.

不同地层条件盾构始发对地表沉降影响规律研究

赵耀强¹，李元海¹，朱世友²，林志斌¹

1.中国矿业大学深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室，江苏徐州 221008；2.中铁隧道勘测设计院有限公司，天津 300133

出版日期:2011-08-20 发布日期:2011-11-02
作者简介:赵耀强(1984—)，男，山东聊城人，中国矿业大学桥梁与隧道工程专业在读硕士研究生，主要从事隧道与地下工程领域的研究工作。

Study on Rules of Influence of Shield Launching in Different Strata on Ground Surface Settlement

ZHAO Yaoqiang¹，LI Yuanhai¹，ZHU Shiyou²，LIN Zhibin¹

1. State Key Laboratory for GeoMechanics & Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221008, Jiangsu, China; 2. China Railway Tunnel Survey & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300133, China

Online:2011-08-20 Published:2011-11-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对盾构始发施工造成地表沉降过大、导致工程事故时有发生的问题，采用岩土通用软件FLAC3D建立盾构始发三维模型，对北京、杭州、南京和上海4典型地区代表土层盾构始发施工的全过程进行模拟计算，总结出各典型地区盾构始发施工对地表变形的影响规律，并提出相应的施工建议。研究结果表明，相同施工条件下：1) 不同地层盾构始发地表沉降差别较大，黏性土较砂性土沉降槽影响范围相对较大，中心点沉降量相对较小；2)典型地区均为黏性土条件下地表沉降较小，非黏性土地层条件下地表沉降较大且在横向基坑边界处地表差异沉降较大；3)典型地区从地表沉降控制效果由好到差排序为北京＞南京＞杭州＞上海。

关键词: 盾构始发, 地层参数, 地表沉降, 数值模拟

Abstract:

Accident often happens due to the serious ground surface settlement caused by shield launching. 3D shield-launching model is established by means of FLAC3D program. The full course of shield launching in typical strata in Beijing, Hangzhou, Nanjing and Shanghai is simulated, the rules of the influence of the shield launching in the above-mentioned typical strata on the ground surface settlement are summarized and countermeasures are proposed. The study result shows that under the same construction conditions: 1) the ground surface settlement induced by shield launching in different strata varies much, the scope of the influence of the settlement trough in cohesive soil is larger than that in sandy soil and the settlement at the central point in the case of cohesive soil is smaller than that in the case of sandy soil. 2) In the case of cohesive soil in the above-mentioned typical regions, the ground surface settlement is small; in the case of non-cohesive soil, the ground surface settlement is large and the differential ground surface settlement at the transverse boundary of the foundation pits is large. 3) The effect of the control of the ground surface settlement in Beijing is the best, that in Nanjing takes the second place, that in Hangzhou takes the third place and that in Shanghai is the worst.

Key words: shield launching, strata parameter, ground surface settlement, numerical simulation

赵耀强, 李元海, 朱世友, 林志斌. 不同地层条件盾构始发对地表沉降影响规律研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2011, 31(4): 463-469.

DIAO Yao-Jiang, LI Yuan-Hai, SHU Shi-You, LIN Zhi-Bin. Study on Rules of Influence of Shield Launching in Different Strata on Ground Surface Settlement[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2011, 31(4): 463-469.

[1]	黄章君, 杨艳玲, 汤东桑, 张卫中. 大尺寸矩形顶管始发井反力墙数值模拟与监测[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(7): 972-980.
[2]	张亚洲. 考虑密封垫表面工作状态的盾构隧道接缝防水能力数值模拟研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(6): 813-820.
[3]	张振华, 白永厚, 郭春, 程江浩. 钻爆法施工隧道噪声传播特性研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(6): 821-826.
[4]	罗文静, 邹成路. 南宁半成岩地层明暗挖地铁车站关键技术及数值分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(5): 727-734.
[5]	刘浩, 祝志恒, 李林毅. 京珠高速公路洋碰隧道水害原因分析及安全性评价[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(5): 747-754.
[6]	何源, 杨钊, 杨擎, 钟涵, 吴诗琦. 孟加拉卡纳普里河水下隧道大直径泥水盾构钢套筒始发关键技术研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(3): 426-434.
[7]	秦佳佳. 合肥地区复合地层盾构掘进参数控制研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(3): 435-443.
[8]	金威，田源，闫自海，王明年. 不同火灾规模下地下共用结构安全性研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(2): 215-222.
[9]	张稳军, 丁超, 张高乐, 王祎, 上官丹丹, 姜坤. 盾构隧道管片接缝复合型密封垫选型设计研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(2): 246-255.
[10]	辛征刚. 内插型锁口管幕群姿态-锁口控制技术试验研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(1): 43-49.
[11]	张志沛，贺阳阳，梁健刚，任建军，赵军，付刚飞. 隧道穿越倾斜煤层采空区段施工力学特征分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S2): 8-16.
[12]	宋远, 黄明利. 地铁隧道新型初期支护结构支护参数敏感性正交数值模拟试验[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S2): 163-168.
[13]	高骏, 孟小伟, 马龙祥, 张超, 刘锦超. 软土地层顶管法地下通道近接桥梁施工保护方案研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S2): 234-241.
[14]	张河. 紧邻地铁深基坑悬臂式挡土墙保护及基坑支护设计研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S2): 294-300.
[15]	刁志刚, 陈钦东, 王智勇. “ 坑中坑” 盾构吊出井施工技术 ———以广州市深层隧道排水系统东濠涌试验段为例[J]. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(S2): 335-344.

不同地层条件盾构始发对地表沉降影响规律研究

Study on Rules of Influence of Shield Launching in Different Strata on Ground Surface Settlement

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价