深埋穿越破碎带隧道衬砌变形规律研究

doi:10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2020.S1.029

中国科学引文数据库（CSCD）来源期刊
中文核心期刊中文科技核心期刊
Scopus RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
美国EBSCO数据库俄罗斯《文摘杂志》
《日本科学技术振兴机构数据库（中国）》

隧道建设（中英文） ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (S1): 232-240.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2020.S1.029

深埋穿越破碎带隧道衬砌变形规律研究

王飞^{1, 2}，高明忠^{1, 2, 3 , *}，林文明⁴，陈海亮^{1, 2}，王明耀^{1, 2}，陆彤^{1, 2}

（1. 四川大学水力学与山区河流开发保护国家重点实验室，四川成都 610065; 
2. 四川大学水利水电学院，四川成都 610065； 3. 深圳大学深地科学与绿色能源研究院， 广东深圳 518060； 4. 同煤国电同忻煤矿有限公司技术服务中心，山西大同 037001）

出版日期:2020-08-30 发布日期:2020-09-15
作者简介:王飞（1995—），男，山西太原人，四川大学岩土工程专业在读硕士，研究方向为地下工程与隧道工程。E-mail: 237456200@qq.com。*通信作者：高明忠， E-mail: gmzh@scu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51822403; 51827901; 51674170）

Study on the Deformation Law of Deepburied Tunnel Lining Crossing Fractured Zone

WANG Fei^{1, 2}, GAO Mingzhong^{1, 2, 3, *}, LIN Wenming⁴, CHEN Hailiang^{1, 2}, WANG Mingyao^{1, 2}, LU Tong^{1, 2}

(1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource & Hydropower,
Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, China; 2. College of Water Resource & Hydropower, Sichuan University,
Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, China; 3. Institute of Deep Earth Sciences and Green Energy, Shenzhen University,
Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, China; 4. Technical Service Center, Tongxin Coal Mine Co., Ltd., Datong 037001, Shanxi, China)

Online:2020-08-30 Published:2020-09-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解决隧道穿越破碎带、断层等不良地质体时导致的隧道结构变形过大，甚至引起垮塌等事故的难题，通过对西南某深埋穿越破碎带隧道衬砌现场监测数据的分析，结合数值模拟试验，研究了该隧道衬砌拱顶下沉、周边收敛变形规律，并对二者进行了对比。结果表明：该隧道工程Ⅳ级至Ⅴ级围岩过渡区发生不均匀沉降，Ⅴ级围岩相对Ⅳ级围岩沉降值大15 mm左右；隧道拱顶沉降量是周边收敛位移的1.25~1.75倍，即拱顶对不均匀沉降的敏感度大于周边，属于隧道结构薄弱部位。基于自主研发的双向滑移式物理模型箱，研究了不均匀沉降条件下衬砌结构变形特征，衬砌轴向变形过程大致可分为5个阶段：弹性应变、土体压密—姿态调整、塑性应变、土体再压密—姿态再调整、断裂破坏，且拱顶轴向变形为拱腰轴向变形的1.75~2.45倍，说明拱顶沉降对围岩完整性的敏感度大于周边收敛，应重点做好拱顶的监测与防护。

关键词: 隧道, 破碎带, 变形特征, 现场监测, 模型试验, 数值模拟

Abstract: When the tunnel crosses fractured zone and faults, overlarge tunnel structural deformation and even collapse often occur. As a result, the onsite monitoring data of a deepburied tunnel lining crossing fractured zone in southwest China are analyzed. And based on numerical simulation experiments, the laws of tunnel crown settlement and peripheral convergence are studied, and comparison is made between the two laws. The results show: (1) Uneven settlement occurs to the transition zone between Grade Ⅳ and Ⅴ surrounding rocks, and the settlement of Grade Ⅴ surrounding rock is 15 mm larger than that of Grade Ⅳ surrounding rock. (2) The settlement of tunnel crown is about 1.25~1.75 times of the peripheral convergent displacement, which indicates that the sensitivity of the tunnel crown to the uneven settlement is greater than peripheral area, and the tunnel crown is the weak part of the tunnel structure. Based on the selfdeveloped twoway sliding physical model box, the deformation properties of lining under the condition of uneven settlement are studied. The study results show that the tunnel lining deformation under uneven settlement can be roughly divided into five stages, i.e. elastic strain stage, soil compactionattitude adjustment stage, plastic strain stage, soil recompactionattitude adjustment stage, and fracture failure stage; the tunnel crown axial deformation of each section is about 1.75~2.45 times of the peripheral convergence, which also shows that the sensitivity of the tunnel crown to environmental variation is greater than that of peripheral convergence, and monitoring and protection should be carried out for tunnel crown.

Key words: tunnel, fractured zone, deformation properties, insitu monitoring, model test, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

U 45

王飞, 高明忠, 林文明, 陈海亮, 王明耀, 陆彤. 深埋穿越破碎带隧道衬砌变形规律研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2020, 40(S1): 232-240.

WANG Fei, GAO Mingzhong, LIN Wenming, CHEN Hailiang, WANG Mingyao, LU Tong.

Study on the Deformation Law of Deepburied Tunnel Lining Crossing Fractured Zone [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2020, 40(S1): 232-240.

[1]	李凤远, 曾垂刚. 全断面隧道掘进机智能制造与运维发展现状及趋势[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(S1): 6-13.
[2]	单联君, 郭建民, 倪芃芃, 李剑锋, 马会环, 孙伟. 沉管隧道接头型式发展及变形机制研究进展[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(S1): 14-24.
[3]	徐博, 谢慈航, 吴莹. 隧道围岩分级方法研究综述[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(S1): 25-36.
[4]	王青松. 关于我国山岭隧道钻爆法施工技术发展的一些思考[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(S1): 37-45.
[5]	张明聚, 王思卿, 李鹏飞, 徐晴. 考虑防排水系统的隧道渗流场解析[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(S1): 46-53.
[6]	杨立新. 隧道斜井隔板式通风中应用射流风机的问题研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(S1): 54-60.
[7]	剧仲林. 隧道进洞施工简易力学分析方法[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(S1): 61-71.
[8]	陈健, 靳军伟, 李新潮, 杨公标, 李明宇, 靳倩倩. 基于XGBoost算法的大直径穿黄隧道施工期管片上浮研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(S1): 72-80.
[9]	王树英, 汪来, 杨鹏, 龚振宇. 渣土改良下盾构掘进富水砾砂地层响应研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(S1): 87-97.
[10]	李鹏飞, 逯倩倩, 葛辰贺, 刘腾, 王硕, 郭琰琦. 基于冗余度的非对称基坑双环梁支护结构抗连续性破坏分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(S1): 109-120.
[11]	李鹏飞, 李泽, 葛辰贺, 郭飞. 砂性地层盖挖逆作地铁车站深基坑开挖变形特性及冗余度分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(S1): 98-108.
[12]	李平. 基于丁达尔效应的隧道洞口车辆安全无障碍阻拦技术研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(S1): 131-138.
[13]	彭元栋, 张克含, 李少华, 刘富强, 苏岳威. 新型软土固化剂加固软土试验及应用研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(S1): 139-144.
[14]	鲁义强, 史博然, 贺飞, 袁勇, 姚旭朋, 张姣龙. 基于CVISC模型的深埋圆硐黏弹塑性解[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(S1): 145-153.
[15]	刘学, 郭廷科, 沈龙, 王鑫, 徐东明, 翟兆玺. 土岩复合地层不同锚固长度预应力锚索锚固机制及现场测试[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(S1): 154-162.

深埋穿越破碎带隧道衬砌变形规律研究

Study on the Deformation Law of Deepburied Tunnel Lining Crossing Fractured Zone

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价