• 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊中文科技核心期刊
  • Scopus RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 美国EBSCO数据库 俄罗斯《文摘杂志》
  • 《日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(中国)》
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S1): 61-71.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2023.S1.008

• 研究与探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

隧道进洞施工简易力学分析方法

剧仲林   

  1. (中铁十二局集团第四工程有限公司, 陕西 西安 710021
  • 出版日期:2023-07-31 发布日期:2023-08-24
  • 作者简介:剧仲林(1968—),男,陕西西安人,1992年毕业于石家庄铁道学院,铁道工程专业,本科,正高级工程师,现从事岩土工程、地下工程等领域的施工技术与科研工作。Email: juzhonglin681104@163.com。

Simple Mechanical Analysis Method for Tunnel Construction

JU Zhonglin   

  1. (The 4th Engineering Co., Ltd. of China Railway 12th Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Xi′an 710021, Shaanxi, China)
  • Online:2023-07-31 Published:2023-08-24

摘要: 隧道进洞采用“导向墙+大管棚”的方法在围岩较好时,存在浪费的问题,而在围岩较差时,存在针对性不足且不够安全的问题。为了解决该问题,采取库仑土压力理论对隧道进洞施工过程中的洞口仰坡土压力进行计算分析,得出洞口端墙是稳定洞口仰坡的重要措施,控制初期支护沉降是洞口段施工的关键。以朗肯土压力原理计算出隧道各级围岩“浅埋等压”埋深,浅埋等压时隧道支护结构处于无弯矩的有利应力状态,而只有侧向荷载作用下的支护结构为最不利应力状态,计算其支护结构最大内力,得出结构的合理厚度,对于外露及接近外露的浅埋偏压支护结构部位采取以增加结构截面厚度为主的措施来应对。偏压状态的实质是正压状态下主应力作用方向的竖向偏转,将偏压初期支护的计算分析简化为正压主应力方向的偏转即可。以工程实例来对照说明“导向墙+大管棚”进洞和“棚洞”法进洞二者的优劣,证明当前隧道进洞方案有很大的优化空间,并以一个具有全、强风化花岗岩地质,具有支护结构外露的显著浅埋偏压的工程实例来验证说明上述技术的优势。本文认为以挡土墙来稳定洞口仰坡是隧道进洞的关键措施,洞口段施工的重点在于控制支护沉降,支护结构外露的浅埋偏压隧道应采取增大外露部位的支护结构刚度的处理措施。

关键词: 隧道, 上导坑法进洞, 仰坡稳定, 土压力, 挡土墙, 洞口段, 浅埋等压, 偏压

Abstract: The "guiding wall + large pipe shed" is basically the only method for tunnel entry at present. When the surrounding rock condition is good, it is a waste to use guiding wall and large pipe shed, whereas when the surrounding rock condition is bad, it is insufficient in specificity and safety. Therefore, the Coulomb soil pressure theory is used to calculate and analyze the soil pressure on the front slope of the tunnel entrance during the construction process, obtaining the conclusions that the end wall of the entrance is an important measure to stabilize the front slope of the entrance and controlling the primary support settlement is the key to the construction of the portal section. Then, the Rankine earth pressure principle is used to calculate the "shallow buried equal pressure" burial depth of surrounding rocks at all levels of the tunnel. The tunnel support structure is in a favorable stress state without bending moment under shallow buried equal pressure, and that is in the most unfavorable stress state under only lateral load. The maximum internal force of the support structure is calculated, and the reasonable thickness of the structure is obtained. This serves as a reference value for increasing the stiffness of the "exposed" and near exposed shallow buried eccentric pressure tunnel support structure by increasing the thickness of the structural section. The essence of the bias state is the vertical deflection of the direction of the main stress action under the positive pressure state, which simplifies the calculation and analysis of the primary support under bias pressure to the deflection of the main stress direction under the positive pressure. Finally, an engineering example is used to illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of the "guide wall + large pipe shed" method and the "shed hole" method for tunnel entry, proving that the current tunnel entry plan still needs to be optimized. As weill, an engineering example with fully-and stronglyweathered granite geology with significant shallow buried bias with support structure "exposed" is used to verify the advantages of the above technology. It is concluded that using retaining walls to stabilize the front slope of the tunnel entrance is a key measure for tunnel entry; the construction of the portal section should focus on controlling support settlement, the method of increasing the stiffness of the support structure in the exposed part of the shallow buried bias tunnel with exposed support structure should be adopted.

Key words: tunnel, top heading method, front slope stability, soil pressure, retaining wall, opening section, shallow isobaric, bias voltage