• 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊中文科技核心期刊
  • Scopus RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 美国EBSCO数据库 俄罗斯《文摘杂志》
  • 《日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(中国)》
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S1): 344-355.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2023.S1.040

• 规划与设计 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于变形分级的挤压性围岩铁路隧道断面形状优化设计

杨斌1, 刘天赐2, 刘志春3, *, 李宁4, 5, 朵生君5   

  1. 1. 甘肃天陇铁路有限公司, 甘肃 兰州 730030 2. 衡水铁路电气化学校, 河北 衡水 053000; 3. 石家庄铁道大学土木工程学院, 河北 石家庄 050043; 4. 特殊复杂环境下长大隧道建造技术铁路行业工程研究中心, 陕西 西安 710043; 5. 中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司, 陕西 西安 710043)

  • 出版日期:2023-07-31 发布日期:2023-08-28
  • 作者简介:杨斌(1984—),男,甘肃平川人,2006年毕业于兰州交通大学,土木工程专业,本科,高级工程师,现从事铁路工程建设管理工作。Email: 931824113@qq.com。*通信作者: 刘志春, Email: liuzhch01@163.com。

CrossSection Shape Optimization Design of Railway Tunnel in Squeezing Rock Based on Deformation Classification

YANG Bin1, LIU Tianci2, LIU Zhichun3, *, LI Ning4, 5, DUO Shengjun5   

  1. (1.Gansu Tian Long Railway Co., Ltd., Lanzhou 730030, Gansu, China;2. Hengshui Railway Electrification School, Hengshui 053000, Hebei, China;3. School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, Hebei, China;4. Engineering Research Center of Railway Industry of Construction Technology for Long Tunnel in Special and Complex Environment, Xi′ an 710043, Shaanxi, China;5.China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Xi′an 710043, Shaanxi, China)

  • Online:2023-07-31 Published:2023-08-28

摘要: 针对较大形变压力作用下挤压性围岩隧道断面形状优化的问题,在时速200 km客货共线铁路隧道建筑限界的基础上拟定单线和双线铁路隧道断面形状,通过结构安全性评价,提出不同变形等级条件下单线和双线铁路隧道较经济、安全的断面形式。研究结果表明: 1)随着变形等级的增加,围岩压力显著增大,结构安全系数明显降低,从建筑限界出发拟定的最经济的隧道断面不能满足结构安全性要求。2)拱脚及墙脚是隧道结构受力薄弱部位,通过优化断面曲率实现拱部与边墙、边墙与仰拱的圆顺衔接,可有效改善结构受力状态,提高结构安全性。3)对于单线铁路隧道,Ⅰ级变形条件下推荐采用单线断面A(与常规单线铁路隧道断面相衔接),Ⅱ级变形条件下推荐采用单线断面B(在单线断面A的基础上对断面曲率进行优化),Ⅲ、Ⅳ级变形条件下推荐采用单线断面E(圆形)。4)对于双线铁路隧道,Ⅰ、Ⅱ级变形条件下推荐采用双线断面C(在常规双线铁路隧道的基础上优化断面曲率),Ⅲ、Ⅳ级变形条件下推荐采用双线断面E(圆形)。5)工程实践中,隧道断面优化应综合考虑结构安全、区段衔接和施工便利性,综合确定各区段隧道断面形状; 在Ⅳ级变形条件下,应加强注浆加固,并采用多层支护及应力释放等技术措施保证隧道结构安全。

关键词: 挤压性围岩, 铁路隧道, 断面形状, 变形分级, 安全系数, 优化设计

Abstract:  To optimize the crosssection shape of squeezed surrounding rock tunnels under large deformation pressure, the crosssection shapes of single-and doubletrack railway tunnels are determined based on the construction clearance of passenger and freight railway tunnel with a speed of 200 km/h. Economic and safe crosssection types of single-and doubletrack railway tunnels under various deformation levels are proposed through structural safety evaluation. The conclusions are drawn as follows: (1) With an increase in deformation level, the structural load increases and the structural safety coefficient decreases evidently. The most economical tunnel crosssection proposed based on the construction clearance cannot meet the structural safety requirements. (2) The arch and wall feet are the weak parts of the tunnel structure. By optimizing the curvature of tunnel crosssection, the smooth connection between arch and sidewall and that between sidewall and inverted arch can be realized, thus effectively improving the stress state of the structure and the structural safety. (3) For single track tunnel: singletrack A crosssection type (connected with the normal singletrack tunnel section) is recommended for grade I deformation, singletrack B crosssection type (optimized crosssection curvature based on singletrack A crosssection) is recommended for grade II deformation, and singletrack E crosssection (circular) is recommended for grades III and IV deformation. (4) For doubletrack tunnel: doubletrack C crosssection type (crosssection curvature optimized on the basis of conventional doubletrack tunnel) is recommended for grades I and II deformation, and doubletrack E crosssection (circular) is recommended for grades III and IV deformation. (5) In engineering practice, the crosssection type should be comprehensively optimized considering structural safety, zone connection, and construction convenience. Under grade IV deformation condition, strengthened grouting reinforcement, multilayer support, and stress release should be conducted to ensure the safety of the tunnel structure.

Key words: squeezing rock, railway tunnel, tunnel crosssection shape, deformation classification, safety factor, optimization design