• CSCD核心中文核心科技核心
  • RCCSE(A+)公路运输高质量期刊T1
  • Ei CompendexScopusWJCI
  • EBSCOPж(AJ)JST
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 383-393.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2026.02.013

• 施工技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

硬岩破碎带TBM卡机风险智能判识及预防技术

潘岳1, 2, 谢韬1, 刘永胜3, 高攀1, 杨振兴3   

  1. (1. 中铁隧道局集团有限公司, 广东 广州 511458; 2. 深圳大学土木与交通工程学院, 广东 深圳 518060; 3. 隧道掘进机及智能运维全国重点实验室, 河南 郑州 450001)
  • 出版日期:2026-02-20 发布日期:2026-02-20
  • 作者简介:潘岳(1993—),男,四川成都人,2021年毕业于西南交通大学,地质资源与地质工程专业,博士,高级工程师,现从事隧道与地下工程研究工作。E-mail: yuepan@my.swjtu.edu.cn。

Intelligent Identification and Prevention of TBM Jamming in Hard-Rock Fractured Zones

PAN Yue1, 2, XIE Tao1, LIU Yongsheng3, GAO Pan1, YANG Zhenxing3   

  1. (1. China Railway Tunnel Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 511458, Guangdong, China; 2. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Tunnel Boring Machine and Intelligent Operations, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China)
  • Online:2026-02-20 Published:2026-02-20

摘要: 为解决敞开式TBM穿越硬岩破碎带时卡机风险超前判识及预处理技术难题,依托某TBM隧道工程开展系统性研究。通过累计16 km TBM掘进参数及护盾监测数据统计分析,揭示硬岩破碎带TBM卡机事故的力学机制及其典型参数响应特征。基于参数特征分析,遴选出TBM最大总推力、刀盘最大转矩、护盾最大压力及护盾最大位移变化量作为卡机风险评价关键指标,并采用机器学习算法构建卡机风险预测模型。在此基础上,提出基于多参数权重分析的卡机类型判别方法,实现不同类型卡机事故的准确识别,为现场采取针对性处理措施提供依据。采用离散元数值模拟方法分析不同支护措施对降低卡机风险的作用效果,结合工程实践验证,提出针对不同卡机类型的优化处理方案。研究结果表明: 1)当存在卡机风险时,TBM总推力和转矩会持续维持在较高水平;护盾产生较大向内位移,或主司机主动顶升产生较大向外位移; 同时护盾压力急剧上升并保持高位稳定。2)所构建的神经网络预测模型准确率为80.8%,随机森林预测模型准确率达到84.6%。3)采用密集型钢拱架支护方案可使围岩压力最大降低约10%,而实施超前支护措施可使围岩压力降幅超过50%。4)当预测可能卡护盾时,需启动刀盘和皮带机脱困模式,同时加强拱架支护;当可能出现护盾刀盘双卡时,必须采用超前支护,同时加强出护盾后的支护结构。

关键词: 敞开式TBM, 硬岩破碎带, 卡机风险, 机器学习, 智能判识, 围岩压力

Abstract: The authors discuss the advance identification and pretreatment techniques for jamming risks of open tunnel boring machines (TBMs) when traversing fractured zones in hard rock. This issue is addressed by a case study conducted on a TBM tunnel project that statistically analyzes the TBM driving parameters and shield-monitoring data accumulated over 16 km of tunneling. The results reveal the mechanism that jams the TBM when boring through fractured hard rock and the typical parametric response. By analyzing the parameters, primary factors such as maximum TBM thrust, maximum cutterhead torque, maximum force on the shield, and maximum variation in shield displacement are selected to assess jamming risks. Machine learning algorithms are used to construct a model to predict jamming risks. Furthermore, a jamming-type classification method based on multiparameter weight analysis is proposed, enabling the accurate identification of various jamming scenarios and providing a theoretical basis for targeted on-site mitigation measures. Additionally, the effectiveness of various measures designed to reduce jamming risks is systematically analyzed using a discrete-element numerical simulation. Finally, optimized treatment solutions for various types of jamming are proposed based on engineering practice. The research results demonstrate the following: (1) During jamming incidents, TBM thrust and torque remain consistently high; the shield exhibits either significant inward displacement or notable outward displacement under active jacking by the operator, and the shield radial force increases sharply and remains high. (2) The neural network (random forest) prediction model achieves an accuracy of 80.8% (84.6%). (3) Densely arranged steel arch supports reduce surrounding rock pressure by approximately 10%, whereas advance support measures reduce it by over 50%. (4) When shield jamming is anticipated, the cutterhead and belt conveyor rescue mode should be activated while strengthening the arch support. When the shield and cutterhead both exhibit jamming risk, advance support must be adopted, and the support structure behind the shield should be reinforced.

Key words: open TBM, hard-rock fractured zone, jamming risk, machine learning, intelligent identification, rock pressure