• 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊中文科技核心期刊
  • Scopus RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 美国EBSCO数据库 俄罗斯《文摘杂志》
  • 《日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(中国)》
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (S1): 266-269.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2020.S1.034

• 规划与设计 • 上一篇    下一篇

山地环境隧道内空轨结构形式比选分析

邓文武, 张蛟   

  1. (中铁第六勘察设计院集团有限公司, 天津 300308
  • 出版日期:2020-08-30 发布日期:2020-09-14
  • 作者简介:邓文武(1988—),男,黑龙江双城人,2014年毕业于华东交通大学,结构工程专业,硕士,工程师,主要从事城市轨道交通设计研究工作。E-mail: 841113228@qq.com。

Comparison and Analysis of Structure Form of Sky Train in Tunnel at Mountainous Areas

DENG Wenwu, ZHANG Jiao   

  1. (China Railway Liuyuan Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300308, China)
  • Online:2020-08-30 Published:2020-09-14

摘要: 作为轨道交通系统的一个分支,空轨的研究及应用已有超过100多年的历史,目前主要应用于地势相对平坦的地区。为扩大空轨的适用范围,在山地环境等特定地区,将隧道与空轨结构相结合,以缩短线路长度、优化设计、降低造价。从结构受力、结构材料、施工及运营维护等方面对隧道内4种结构形式空轨的优缺点进行定性比选分析。对于隧道内梁柱结构形式空轨,隧道与空轨梁柱结构为2个相对独立的系统,对隧道衬砌结构无特殊要求,受力明确,施工技术成熟,可进行工厂化生产及装配式施工。因此建议优先采用隧道内梁柱结构形式。

关键词: 空轨, 隧道, 结构形式, 比选分析

Abstract: As a branch of rail transit system, the sky train has a research and application history of more than 100 years, which is mainly used in flat areas. In order to expand the applicable scope of the sky train, and reduce route length, optimization design and construction cost, the sky train is combined with tunnel in mountainous areas. And then the advantages and disadvantages of several structure forms in tunnel are qualitatively compared and analyzed from the aspects of structural stress, structural materials, construction and operation maintenance. When adopting the form of beam and column structure in the tunnel, the tunnel and the beamcolumn structure are two relatively independent systems, which does not need special requirements for the tunnel lining structure, and is with clear stress condition and mature technology, thus the factory production and prefabricated construction can be carried out. It is suggested that the structure form of tunnel beam and column should be preferred.

Key words: sky train, tunnel, structure form, comparison and analysis

中图分类号: