• 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊中文科技核心期刊
  • Scopus RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 美国EBSCO数据库 俄罗斯《文摘杂志》
  • 《日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(中国)》
二维码

隧道建设(中英文) ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (S2): 494-502.DOI: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2021.S2.063

• 施工技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

盾构穿越锚索群处置技术研究——以深圳地铁9号线西延线盾构区间为例

杨立涛1, 邓峰2, 石红兵1, 邝利军3, 陈泽3, *, 衣利伟3   

  1. 1. 中国建设基础设施有限公司, 北京 100089 2. 中建南方投资有限公司, 广东 深圳 518000;3.中国建筑第五工程局有限公司, 湖南 长沙 410000)

  • 出版日期:2021-12-31 发布日期:2022-03-18
  • 作者简介:杨立涛(1970—),男,河北安国人,1993年毕业于重庆建筑工程学院,工业与民用建筑专业,本科,高级工程师,主要从事基础设施建设工作。E-mail: 286068582@qq.com。*通信作者: 陈泽, E-mail: 905173792@qq.com。

Treatment Technology of Shield Passing through Anchor Cable Group: a Case Study of Shield Section of West 

Extension Line of Shenzhen Metro Line 9

YANG Litao1, DENG Feng2, SHI Hongbing1, KUANG Lijun3, CHEN Ze3, *, YI Liwei3   

  1. (1. China Construction Infrastructure Co., Ltd., Beijing 410004, China;

    2. China Construction South Investment Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518103, Guangdong, China; 3. China Construction Fifth Engineering Division Co., Ltd., Changsha 410004, Hunan, China)

  • Online:2021-12-31 Published:2022-03-18

摘要: 为解决盾构穿越锚索群施工时锚索难处理的问题,以深圳地铁9号线西延线工程的4个盾构区间为例,通过尝试方案1(人工挖孔竖井+穿心千斤顶拔除)、方案2(人工挖孔竖井+套管钻机拔除)、方案3(人工挖孔竖井+旋挖钻拔除)、方案4(暗挖+空推处理)、方案5(旋挖钻拔除+地面加固强推)和方案6(地面直接加固+盾构强推),总结该线路锚索处理及盾构穿越的施工经验。研究结果表明: 1)方案5是最合适的处置方案; 2)人工挖孔竖井与其他方式结合的方案均不可靠; 3)方案4工期长、费用高、地面沉降难控制; 4)方案6使得盾构在锚索段掘进时转矩增大、掘进速度下降,且开舱换刀的频率和次数较高。故盾构施工穿越锚索群时,推荐首选旋挖钻拔除+地面加固强推的方案。

关键词: 地铁, 盾构, 锚索群, 人工挖孔竖井, 旋挖钻拔除, 地面加固

Abstract: When shield tunneling through anchor cable group, anchor cables should be removed. In this paper, a case study is conducted on four shield sections of west extension line of Shenzhen metro line 9, and six schemes are studied, including manual excavated shaft + anchor cable removing by cavity jack(scheme 1), manual excavated shaft + anchor cable removing by casting pipe(scheme 2), manual excavated shaft + anchor cable removing by rotary drill(scheme 3), mining excavation + shield advancing without force(scheme 4), anchor cable removing by rotary drill + ground reinforcement and shield pushing(scheme 5), and direct ground reinforcement + shield pushing(scheme 6). The shield tunneling construction experience and the anchor cable treatment technology are summarized. The results show the following: (1) The scheme 5 is optimal. (2) The schemes with manual excavated shaft are not feasible. (3) The scheme 4 has disadvantages such as long construction period, high cost, and difficult control of ground settlement. (4) The scheme 6 will increase the shield torque and cutter replacing times and reduce the tunnel speed. Accordingly, the scheme 5 is recommended.

Key words: metro, shield, anchor cable group, manual excavated shaft, anchor cable removing by rotary drill, ground reinforcement